Comelec Chair Sixto Brillantes, Jr. |
“The interest of society and the
maintenance of good government demand a full discussion of public affairs . . .
a public officer must not be too thin-skinned with reference to comment upon
his official acts,” so goes Justice Malcolm in the landmark case of US v.
Bustos, in his disquisition on freedom of speech.
But Comelec Chairman Sixto
Brillantes, Jr., a former San Beda College of Law professor and practicing
lawyer, must have already forgotten this
mandatory case law reading in law school when he threatened to sue critics of
the just concluded midterm elections in the Philippines . Reacting to allegations of massive glitches
in the implementation of the 2013 computerized elections and criticisms that it
was worse than the 2010 elections, Brillantes said “[t]hose people who keep on
blabbering but know nothing, they are the ones I’m going to charge. All of them.”
While it is completely understandable
that planning and handling the elections in 1,630 municipalities and cities
around the country is a daunting task and must be draining, physically and
mentally, Brillantes should not lose sight of the fact that he took the job of
election chief voluntarily and as a public office, it is open to public criticisms,
whether justified or not.
Threatening to sue critics – aside
from being stupid, because criticism of official conduct, unless proven to be malicious,
is not libelous – has a chilling effect on free speech, for it deters others
from commenting on what they perceive to be inefficiencies in the government
and calling on public officials for any wrongdoing. In a democratic society like the Philippines ,
freedom to comment on the workings of the government and conduct of public
officials is one of the strongest checks against the excesses, abuses, and other
misconduct of officialdom.